Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J. pediatr. (Rio J.) ; 90(4): 389-395, Jul-Aug/2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-720899

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to assess the use of the Brazilian criteria for reporting of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in the neonatal unit and compare them with the criteria proposed by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). METHODS: this was a cross-sectional study conducted from 2009 to 2011. It included neonates with HAI reporting by at least one of the criteria. Statistical analysis included calculation of incidence density of HAIs, distribution by weight, and by reporting criterion. Analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the national criteria was performed considering the NHSN as the gold standard, with agreement assessed by kappa. RESULTS: a total of 882 newborns were followed, and 330 had at least one infection notified by at least one of the criteria. A total of 522 HAIs were reported, regardless of the criteria. An incidence density of 27.28 infections per 1,000 patient-days was observed, and the main topographies were sepsis (58.3%), candidiasis (15.1%), and conjunctivitis (6.5%). A total of 489 (93.7%) were notified by both criteria, eight infections were notified only by the national criteria (six cases of necrotizing enterocolitis and two cases of conjunctivitis), and 25 cases of clinical sepsis were reported by NHSN criteria only. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 95.1%, 98.6%, 98.4%, and 95.7%, respectively, for all topographies, and were 91.8%, 100%, 100%, and 96.3% for the analysis of sepsis. Kappa analysis showed an agreement of 96.9%. CONCLUSION: there was a high rate of agreement between the criteria. The use of the national criteria facilitates the reporting of sepsis in newborns, and can help to improve the specificity and PPV. .


OBJETIVO: avaliar a aplicação dos critérios nacionais para notificação de infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde (IRAS) em Unidade Neonatal e comparar com os critérios propostos pelo National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). MÉTODOS: estudo transversal realizado de 2009 a 2011. Forma incluídos os neonatos que apresentaram notificação de IRAS por pelo menos um dos critérios. Análise estatística incluiu cálculo de densidade de incidência de IRAS e distribuição por peso e por critério de notificação. Foi realizada análise da sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo (VPP) e valor preditivo negativo (VPN) para os critérios nacionais, considerando o NHSN como padrão-ouro e a concordância avaliada pelo Kappa. RESULTADOS: foram acompanhados 882 neonatos, e 330 apresentaram pelo menos uma infecção notificada por, no mínimo, um dos critérios. Foram notificadas 522 IRAS, independentemente do critério. Observou-se densidade de incidência de 27,28 infecções por 1.000 pacientes-dia, e as principais topografias foram sepse (58,3%), monilíase (15,1%) e conjuntivite (6,5%). Um total de 489 (93,7%) notificações foram por ambos os critérios; oito infecções foram notificadas apenas pelo critério nacional (duas conjuntivites e seis enterocolites necrosantes); e 25 casos de sepse clínica foram notificadas apenas pelo NHSN. A sensibilidade, especificidade, VPP e VPN foram de 95,1%, 98,6%, 98,4%, 95,7%, respectivamente, para todas as topografias, e para análise de sepse foram 91,8%, 100%, 100% e 96,3%. O Kappa revelou concordância de 96,9%. CONCLUSÃO: verificou-se uma elevada concordância entre os critérios. A utilização dos critérios nacionais facilita a n...


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Infection Control/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care/standards , Sepsis/epidemiology , Birth Weight , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Incidence , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Neonatology , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
J. pediatr. (Rio J.) ; 89(2): 189-196, mar.-abr. 2013. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-671455

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors and lethality of late onset laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (ICSLC) in a Brazilian neonatal unit for progressive care (NUPC). Methods: This was a case-control study, performed from 2008 to 2012. Cases were defined as all newborns with late onset ICSLC, excluding patients with isolated common skin contaminants. Controls were newborns who showed no evidence of late onset ICSLC, matched by weight and time of permanence in the NUPC. Variables were obtained in the Hospital Infection Control Committee (HICC) database. Analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The chi-squared test was used, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, followed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 50 patients with late onset ICSLC were matched with 100 patients without late onset ICSLC. In the group of patients with late onset ICSLC, a a significant higher proportion of patients who underwent surgical procedures (p = 0.001) and who used central venous catheter (CVC) (p = 0.012) and mechanical ventilation (p = 0.001) was identified. In multivariate analysis, previous surgery and the use of CVC remained significantly associated with infection (p = 0.006 and p = 0.047; OR: 4.47 and 8.99, respectively). Enterobacteriacea was identified in 14 cases, with three (21.4%) deaths, and Staphylococcus aureus was identified in 20 cases, with three (15%) deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical procedures and CVC usage were significant risk factors for ICSLC. Therefore, prevention practices for safe surgery and CVC insertion and manipulation are essential to reduce these infections, in addition to training and continuing education to surgical and assistance teams.


OBJETIVO: Avaliar os fatores de risco e a letalidade da infecção da corrente sanguínea laboratorialmente confirmada (ICSLC) de início tardio em uma Unidade Neonatal de Cuidados Progressivos (UNCP) brasileira. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de um estudo caso-controle realizado de 2008 a 2012. Os casos foram definidos como todos os recém-nascidos com ICSLC de início tardio, excluindo pacientes isolados com contaminantes da pele comuns. Os controles foram recém-nascidos que não mostraram qualquer evidência de ICSLC de início tardio, sendo separados por peso e tempo de permanência na UNCP. As variáveis foram obtidas na base de dados da Comissão de Controle de Infecção Hospitalar (CCIH). A análise foi realizada utilizando o Pacote Estatístico para Ciências Sociais. O teste χ² foi utilizado e a relevância estatística foi definida como p < 0,05, seguida pela análise multivariada. RESULTADOS: No estudo, 50 pacientes com ICSLC de início tardio foram combinados com 100 pacientes sem ICSLC de início tardio. No grupo de pacientes com ICSLC de início tardio, identificamos uma proporção significativamente maior de pacientes que foram submetidos a procedimentos cirúrgicos (p = 0,001) e que usaram cateter venoso central (CVC) (p = 0,012) e ventilação mecânica (p = 0,001). Na análise multivariada, cirurgia prévia e uso de CVC permaneceram significativamente associados à infecção (p = 0,006 e p = 0,047; OU: 4,47 e 8,99, respectivamente). A Enterobacteriacea foi identificada em 14 casos, com três (21,4%) óbitos, e Staphylococcus aureus foi identificado em 20 casos, com três (15%) óbitos. CONCLUSÕES: Procedimentos cirúrgicos e uso de CVC constituíram fatores de risco significativos para ICSLC. Portanto, práticas de prevenção para cirurgia segura, inserção e manipulação de CVC são essenciais para reduzir essas infecções, além de treinamento e educação contínua às equipes cirúrgicas e de assistência.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Central Venous Catheters/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Sepsis/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/mortality , Epidemiologic Methods , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/mortality , Intensive Care Units , Laboratories, Hospital , Risk Factors , Sepsis/mortality , Staphylococcal Infections/mortality , Time Factors
3.
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 105(6): 757-761, Sept. 2010. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-560659

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of western blot (WB) analysis as a diagnostic tool for congenital toxoplasmosis in 215 newborn infants. The children were submitted to clinical examinations to assess macular, neurological and hearing signals. The WB results obtained were compared to the persistence of IgG antibodies at the end of 12 months, which is regarded as the "gold standard" diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. Association between the WB results and the clinical signs presented by the infants was also assessed. Of the 215 children, 177 had a confirmed congenital toxoplasmosis diagnosis and 38 were uninfected. IgG-WB showed a sensitivity of 73.5 percent and a specificity of 97.4 percent. IgM-WB showed a sensitivity of 54.8 percent and a specificity of 94.7 percent. The IgG-WB and IgM-WB combination increased the sensitivity to 86.5 percent. The IgM-WB-positive children had a 1.4-fold greater risk of presenting active macular lesions than did those that were IgM-WB-negative. This study showed that the WB assay is a useful tool to confirm a diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis and that the IgM-WB-positive results can indicate active macular lesions in newborn infants.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Toxoplasma/immunology , Toxoplasmosis, Congenital , Blotting, Western , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Fetal Blood/immunology , Fetal Blood , Neonatal Screening , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL